BLM Program Support

GENETICS


Genetics

The BLM monitors genetic diversity in the wild horse and burro herds it manages. The WFRHBA of 1971 has no specific guidelines about population genetics, nor do current regulations in 43 CFR part 4700. However, the BLM has an interest in using the best available science and technology to ensure that the genetic diversity in free-roaming WHB is adequate for self-sustaining populations. Some land use plans specify desired genetic diversity outcomes for wild horse and burro herds, but the greater number do not. The NAS report (2013) advised that the BLM should recognize genetic connections between HMAs, and manage WHB as metapopulations. In recent years, most genetic monitoring has used hair follicle samples from captured animals, which are then analyzed in a panel of ‘microsatellite’ loci, which are non-coding genes that can be used to differentiate ancestry, and to gauge genetic diversity. Genetic diversity monitoring using microsatellite DNA markers from hair follicles (NAS 2013) or feces (King et al. 2018) is now somewhat routine. The BLM uses results of that monitoring, for example in deciding whether to increase local genetic diversity by introducing animals from another HMA.

BLM Contact: Paul Griffin, HQ-261. Paul is the COR for the genetics monitoring contract with Texas A&M University, and can help with report interpretation.

Standard Operating Procedures

SOPs for hair follicle genetic sample collection, and mailing for analysis.

Because of history, context, and periodic introductions, most wild horse herds are not truly isolated populations. The National Academies of Sciences report to the BLM (2013) recommended that single HMAs should not be considered isolated genetic populations. Rather, managed herds of wild horses should be considered as components of interacting metapopulations, connected by interchange of individuals and genes due to both natural and human-facilitated movements. The same is true for wild burro herds. Herds in the larger metapopulation have a background of shared domestic breed heritage, and natural and intentional movements of animals between herds. When needed, WHB management has historically used introductions from other HMAs to augment observed heterozygosity, which is a measure of genetic diversity, to reduce the risk of inbreeding-related health effects. Introducing a small number of fertile animals every generation (about every 8-10 years) is a standard management technique that can alleviate potential inbreeding concerns (BLM 2010).

Most herds have been sampled for genetic diversity once or more. Reports from those samples can provide insights into the degree of connectivity between a sampled herd, and other BLM-managed herds. The WHB program research coordinator can help field offices with interpretation of those data, as evidence of genetic connections. Specifically, Appendix F of the 2013 NAS report is a table showing the estimated 'fixation index' (Fst) values between 183 pairs of samples from wild horse herds. Fst is a measure of genetic differentiation, in this case as estimated by the pattern of microsatellite allelic diversity analyzed by Dr. Cothran’s laboratory. Low values of Fst indicate that a given pair of sampled herds has a shared genetic background. The lower the Fst value, the more genetically similar are the two sampled herds. Values of Fst under approximately 0.05 indicate virtually no differentiation, values of 0.10 indicate very little differentiation, and only if values are above about 0.15 are any two sampled subpopulations considered to have evidence of elevated differentiation (Frankham et al. 2010). For most herds, documented Fst values indicate that they exist in a highly connected metapopulation that includes horse (or burro) herds in many other HMAs.

Natural Resources Council of the National Academies of Sciences (NAS). 2013. Using Science to Improve the BLM Wild Horse and Burro Program: A Way Forward. See Chapter 5: “Genetic diversity in free-ranging horse and burro populations.”

For an explanation about the Fst fixation index, see:

Frankham, R., J. D. Ballou, and D. A. Briscoe. 2010. Introduction to conservation genetics, second edition. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York.

Natural Resources Council of the National Academies of Sciences (NAS). 2013. Using Science to Improve the BLM Wild Horse and Burro Program: A Way Forward. See Chapter 5: “Genetic diversity in free-ranging horse and burro populations.”

For an explanation about the Fst fixation index, see:

Frankham, R., J. D. Ballou, and D. A. Briscoe. 2010. Introduction to conservation genetics, second edition. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York.

For a recent summarization showing that almost all BLM-managed herds are highly genetically related, with little to no population substructure in the larger metapopulation, see:

Cothran, E.G., A. Khanshour, S. Funk, E. Conant, R. Juras, and B.W. Davis. 2024. Genetic dynamics of mustang and feral horse populations in the western United States. BioRXiv 2024:577652. DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.28.577652 

Full list of genetic monitoring reports by the Gus Cothran lab is not yet posted to this website.

Contact Paul Griffin (pgriffin) to request HMA-specific genetic analysis reports from Dr. Cothran.